A prompt to full stack web app builder in the same category as Lovable and Bolt, earlier in its polish.
Last verified: 22 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 22 Aug 2026
Macaly landing page, captured 19 Aug 2026 for the board record.
At a glance
716/ 1000
31 votes · No duels yet
Strongest axes
Weakest axes
The verdict
Macaly follows the same playbook as the design led leaders, chat to a working React app with a database attached, and gets a working result on straightforward briefs reliably. Where it trails is consistency on harder briefs: testers reported the generated app losing track of earlier decisions more often than the top of the board across a multi step session, and the visual polish of a first render needs more direction in the prompt to get right.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Community vote
Design
685/ 1000
7 axis votes
Speed
745/ 1000
9 axis votes
Agent performance
697/ 1000
9 axis votes
Reliability
674/ 1000
4 axis votes
Integrations
787/ 1000
2 axis votes
SEO and GEO
734/ 1000
8 axis votes
Scalability
730/ 1000
No axis votes yet, panel baseline shown
Value
693/ 1000
6 axis votes
API and MCP
706/ 1000
8 axis votes
Code ownership
696/ 1000
10 axis votes
What you get
Pricing
Credits are granted monthly rather than daily and do not roll over. The free plan runs on a macaly.app address with 1 GB of traffic, 1 GB of database use and 10,000 backend API calls. Pro at USD 25 a month is what moves a build onto your own domain, with unlimited custom domains, ten times the traffic and database allowance, 100,000 API calls, and the GitHub, Stripe and analytics integrations. A hosting only plan sits below it at USD 5, and an agency tier above at USD 350.
Value carries 6 of the 100 points on the published weights. Prices verified 22 Aug 2026, always check the vendor page before committing.
Opinions
Diane Cormier
@dcormierEditor panel12 Aug 2026Solo founder.
For the price it is a reasonable way to get a working prototype fast, and the workflow felt familiar immediately. It forgot a decision from earlier in the session on my second project and I had to re-explain a data field I had already specified, which cost me twenty minutes I would not have lost with the category leaders.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel07 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Same chat to full stack app pattern as the category leaders, and on a straightforward brief it produced a working result reliably. Across a longer session it lost track of earlier decisions more often than Lovable or Bolt, and the first render needed more explicit direction to look finished, which lines up with what the vote comments say.
Questions
Same category and workflow. Voters rate the category leaders higher on consistency across a long session and on first render design quality, which is what keeps Macaly in B tier for now.
Sources