The default, wired into the place your code already lives.
Last verified: 16 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 22 Aug 2026
GitHub Copilot landing page, captured 21 Aug 2026 for the board record.
At a glance
812/ 1000
74 votes · No duels yet
Strongest axes
Weakest axes
The verdict
Copilot wins on distribution and on the fact that it is already approved wherever GitHub is. Pull request review, issue to pull request agents and editor completion all sit where the work already happens, and the enterprise story is the most complete on the board. Voters rate the raw agent quality a step behind the leaders and the completion latency inconsistent, which puts it at the top of A tier rather than in S.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Community vote
Design
805/ 1000
13 axis votes
Speed
847/ 1000
13 axis votes
Agent performance
771/ 1000
18 axis votes
Reliability
767/ 1000
8 axis votes
Integrations
811/ 1000
10 axis votes
SEO and GEO
855/ 1000
16 axis votes
Scalability
796/ 1000
No axis votes yet, panel baseline shown
Value
819/ 1000
22 axis votes
API and MCP
814/ 1000
19 axis votes
Code ownership
808/ 1000
20 axis votes
What you get
Pricing
Free tier with monthly completion and chat limits. Paid plans start around USD 10 per user per month, among the cheapest entries on the coding agent board, with business and enterprise tiers.
Value carries 6 of the 100 points on the published weights. Prices verified 16 Aug 2026, always check the vendor page before committing.
Opinions
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel14 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
The pull request and issue workflows are the real product now, and nothing else on the board is native to where the code already lives. Raw agent quality is a step behind the leaders on our multi file tests, and completion latency varied more than we expected.
Chris Walton
@cwaltonEditor panel16 Aug 2026Platform engineer at a regulated company.
It is the one our security team already approved, which beats a better tool we cannot use. Nine euros a seat and the review workflows mean it earns its place even though it does not win the agent comparisons.
Questions
For teams already on GitHub, yes, mostly for the pull request and issue workflows. On pure agent quality the board ranks two competitors above it.
Sources